Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with tensor-products
Search options not deleted
user 450
18
votes
Duals and Tensor products
For those interested in general statements, here is a summary of assumptions under which the canonical morphisms of $A$-modules below are isomorphisms:
If $P$ is finitely generated projective:
$$P\ …
- 47.5k
132
votes
3
answers
21k
views
When is the tensor product of two fields a field?
Consider two extension fields $K/k, L/k$ of a field $k$.
A frequent question is whether the tensor product ring $K\otimes_k L$ is a field. The answer is "no" and this answer is often justified by so …
9
votes
Characterisation for separable extension of a field
Let $k\subset K$ be a completely arbitrary extension of fields. This extension is said to be separable if equivalently
a) For all extensions $k\subset L$, the ring $K \otimes _k L$ is reduced. [A r …
- 47.5k
5
votes
reduced ⊗ reduced = reduced; what about connected?
Ad (1): It is perfectly true that the tensor product of two reduced algebras over a perfect field is reduced. You can find a proof in Bourbaki's Algebra (Chapter V; §15; 4,5), but of course this vener …
- 47.5k