Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options questions only not deleted user 450

History and philosophy of mathematics, biographies of mathematicians, mathematics education, recreational mathematics, communication of mathematics.

65 votes
1 answer
4k views

Did Bourbaki write a text on algebraic geometry?

Certainly Bourbaki never wrote an introduction to algebraic geometry: we would have heard about it, right?
Georges Elencwajg's user avatar
15 votes
1 answer
1k views

Who first cared about singular points?

If you look at the cross $C\subset \mathbb A^2_k$ given by $xy=0$ in the affine plane over the field $k$, you see or compute that it is exceptional at $O=(0,0)$ for many (obviously not independent) …
Georges Elencwajg's user avatar
17 votes
3 answers
1k views

Did Grothendieck introduce vertical arrows that denote morphisms?

It is usual in algebraic geometry to represent morphisms by vertical arrows pointing downwards, like that : $$\begin{matrix} X \\\\ \downarrow \\\\ S \end{matrix}$$ I suppose this stemmed from Grot …
Georges Elencwajg's user avatar
35 votes
0 answers
2k views

History of the Proj construction in algebraic geometry

Projective geometry was introduced by fifteenth century Renaissance painters (like Alberti, da Vinci and Dürer) in the guise of perspective theory, although one could argue that Pappus was already doi …
Georges Elencwajg's user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
4k views

Is there another controversial statement by Grothendieck apart from 57 being prime?

There is a well-known story about Grothendieck being asked to explain concretely some result involving prime numbers and of his answering "You mean an actual number? All right, take 57". See here. Un …
Georges Elencwajg's user avatar