Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with canonical-bases
Search options not deleted
user 4366
3
votes
Does some version of U_q(gl(1|1)) have a basis like Lusztig's basis for \dot{U(sl_2)}?
Kashiwara has developed some crystal theoretic methods for the Lie superalgebra $\mathfrak{q}(n)$. However, I think you should look at Khovanov, to get an idea of what it should look like.
- 1,472
3
votes
When does Lusztig's canonical basis have non-positive structure coefficients?
Ben,
I have heard the same thing, but I have never seen an example. After thinking about it a bit, I came up with the following 'heuristic' reason why the structure constants should be positive for ha …
- 1,472