Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Enriched categories, topoi, abelian categories, monoidal categories, homological algebra.
10
votes
Accepted
A slick definition of the Kan extension?
Firstly, the $W$-weighted limit $\lim^W F$ is defined to be a representation of $\operatorname{Psh}_D(W,C(-,F-))$; the definition you've given isn't even well-typed.
There is no difference at all in …
5
votes
Accepted
In what cases does a Yoneda-like embedding preserve monoidal structure?
Day showed that, for suitable V, any monoidal structure on a (V-)functor category $[C^{\mathrm{op}}, V]$ is essentially determined by its restriction to the representables as
$$ F \otimes G = \int^{A, …
5
votes
Ends and coends as Kan extensions (without using the subdivision category of Mac Lane)?
I don't know of any definition involving Kan extensions, but (co)ends can be expressed as (co)limits weighted by a hom functor (see e.g. here), so that for $F \colon C^{op} \times C \to D$ the end $\i …
2
votes
Name of "slice" category with 2-cells as morphisms ?
See this answer to much the same question. I would call this the 'lax' slice category, although it's not so common a notion that everyone would know what you meant, so maybe you should keep the scare …
2
votes
Monomorphisms in functor categories
The answer is yes if $A=R\mbox{-Mod}$ has pullbacks (which I'm pretty sure it does). See Tom Leinster's answer to a similar question.
5
votes
Monadicity and sheaves.
The answer (to the first question) is yes: reflections are always monadic, and the associated monad is idempotent.
10
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Slices of presheaf categories
Apparently it's 'well known' that if $P$ is a presheaf on $C$ then there is an equivalence $\widehat{C}/P \simeq \widehat{\int P}$, where $\int P$ is the usual category of elements and $\widehat{C} = …
10
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Indecomposable objects in a category
According to the Elephant, and these notes, an object X in a category C is indecomposable if given an isomorphism $X \cong \coprod_i U_i$ there is a unique $i$ such that $X \cong U_i$ and $U_j \cong 0 …
27
votes
morita equivalence for categories
That their Cauchy completions are equivalent.
16
votes
Accepted
Limits in functor categories
What you're asking is whether every limit in a functor category $[B,C]$ is a pointwise limit. The answer is yes if C is complete, but not always otherwise. Kelly gives an example in Basic Concepts o …
15
votes
Accepted
The urge to combine 1- and 2-morphisms in slicing a 2-category.
The second definition looks like the 'lax comma category' $C // T$, where a morphism $f \to f'$ is given by a 2-cell $f \to f'\phi$. The defining universal property is the same as for comma objects, …
8
votes
The effective topos - by Hyland
Realizability: An Introduction To Its Categorical Side by Jaap van Oosten is all about realizability toposes.
There are some lecture notes online by Wesley Phoa entitled An introduction to fibrations …
2
votes
Accepted
Functor generalisation
Here is one way to look at it: if V is a monoidal category and $\mathbf{B} V$ is the corresponding one-object bicategory, then a V-category in the usual sense is the same thing as a lax functor $\math …
3
votes
Accepted
Need a reference for cones and limits that does this...
Yes -- filtered/directed colimits commute with finite limits. See Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, theorem IX.2.1.
Edit: Oh, I thought you meant colimits, but it seems you meant …
4
votes
Computing colimits in a Lawvere theory
Prod(L, Set) is equivalent to the category of algebras for a finitary monad on Set and so is complete and cocomplete by e.g. Borceux Vol. 2 prop. 4.3.6.