Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 4262

Enriched categories, topoi, abelian categories, monoidal categories, homological algebra.

10 votes
Accepted

A slick definition of the Kan extension?

Firstly, the $W$-weighted limit $\lim^W F$ is defined to be a representation of $\operatorname{Psh}_D(W,C(-,F-))$; the definition you've given isn't even well-typed. There is no difference at all in …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
5 votes
Accepted

In what cases does a Yoneda-like embedding preserve monoidal structure?

Day showed that, for suitable V, any monoidal structure on a (V-)functor category $[C^{\mathrm{op}}, V]$ is essentially determined by its restriction to the representables as $$ F \otimes G = \int^{A, …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
5 votes

Ends and coends as Kan extensions (without using the subdivision category of Mac Lane)?

I don't know of any definition involving Kan extensions, but (co)ends can be expressed as (co)limits weighted by a hom functor (see e.g. here), so that for $F \colon C^{op} \times C \to D$ the end $\i …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
2 votes

Name of "slice" category with 2-cells as morphisms ?

See this answer to much the same question. I would call this the 'lax' slice category, although it's not so common a notion that everyone would know what you meant, so maybe you should keep the scare …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
2 votes

Monomorphisms in functor categories

The answer is yes if $A=R\mbox{-Mod}$ has pullbacks (which I'm pretty sure it does). See Tom Leinster's answer to a similar question.
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
5 votes

Monadicity and sheaves.

The answer (to the first question) is yes: reflections are always monadic, and the associated monad is idempotent.
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
10 votes
1 answer
1k views

Slices of presheaf categories

Apparently it's 'well known' that if $P$ is a presheaf on $C$ then there is an equivalence $\widehat{C}/P \simeq \widehat{\int P}$, where $\int P$ is the usual category of elements and $\widehat{C} = …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
10 votes
1 answer
1k views

Indecomposable objects in a category

According to the Elephant, and these notes, an object X in a category C is indecomposable if given an isomorphism $X \cong \coprod_i U_i$ there is a unique $i$ such that $X \cong U_i$ and $U_j \cong 0 …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
27 votes

morita equivalence for categories

That their Cauchy completions are equivalent.
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
16 votes
Accepted

Limits in functor categories

What you're asking is whether every limit in a functor category $[B,C]$ is a pointwise limit. The answer is yes if C is complete, but not always otherwise. Kelly gives an example in Basic Concepts o …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
15 votes
Accepted

The urge to combine 1- and 2-morphisms in slicing a 2-category.

The second definition looks like the 'lax comma category' $C // T$, where a morphism $f \to f'$ is given by a 2-cell $f \to f'\phi$. The defining universal property is the same as for comma objects, …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
8 votes

The effective topos - by Hyland

Realizability: An Introduction To Its Categorical Side by Jaap van Oosten is all about realizability toposes. There are some lecture notes online by Wesley Phoa entitled An introduction to fibrations …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
2 votes
Accepted

Functor generalisation

Here is one way to look at it: if V is a monoidal category and $\mathbf{B} V$ is the corresponding one-object bicategory, then a V-category in the usual sense is the same thing as a lax functor $\math …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
3 votes
Accepted

Need a reference for cones and limits that does this...

Yes -- filtered/directed colimits commute with finite limits. See Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, theorem IX.2.1. Edit: Oh, I thought you meant colimits, but it seems you meant …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
4 votes

Computing colimits in a Lawvere theory

Prod(L, Set) is equivalent to the category of algebras for a finitary monad on Set and so is complete and cocomplete by e.g. Borceux Vol. 2 prop. 4.3.6.
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622

15 30 50 per page