Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
3
votes
Accepted
On the de Rham cohomology of 1-forms in cotangent bundle.
As has been noted in Peter Michor's answer, a Hamiltonian isotopy can certainly move the graph of a closed one-form to a Lagrangian submanifold that is not the graph of a one-form.
However, in the sp …
4
votes
Accepted
codimension of bubbling of disk and sphere
Moduli spaces of psuedoholomorphic curves have an associated expected dimension, given by the Fredholm index of the appropriate Cauchy-Riemann operator; if an appropriate transversality condition hold …
7
votes
Accepted
Symplectic blow-up
I don't know a place where this is written up explicitly, but it's not hard as soon as one has an appropriate standard model for a neighborhood of a symplectic manifold for use in the Weinstein Neighb …
13
votes
Accepted
Why (and whether) is any smooth embedded torus in R^4 isotopic to an embedded Lagrangian torus?
Whoever told you that any embedded torus in R4 is isotopic to a Lagrangian torus was sorely mistaken. Luttinger (JDG 1995) observed the following: The manifolds obtained by doing certain Dehn-type su …
19
votes
Accepted
Is the Fukaya category "defined"?
From what I understand, the most fundamental issue obstructing the definition of the Fukaya category in general is the fact that the boundaries of the relevant moduli spaces typically have codimension …