Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with clifford-algebras
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 41291
4
votes
0
answers
112
views
What minimal structure is required to define Clifford modules in a way as abstract as possible?
Start with a quadratic form $q$ on a vector space $V$. A module $M$ over the corresponding Clifford algebra is determined by a map $\cdot:V\otimes M\to M$ satisfying $v\cdot(v\cdot m)=-q(v)m$.
Now tr …
- 18.4k
2
votes
0
answers
95
views
Analogs of Plücker relations in Clifford algebras, and Bott periodicity (?)
Classical Plücker relations can be viewed as conditions on coefficients of an element $x=\sum_Sc_Se_S$, $S=(i_1,...,i_k)$, $i_1<\cdots<i_k$, $\{i_1,...,i_k\}\subset\{1,...,n\}$ of an exterior power $\ …
- 18.4k