Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with gn.general-topology
Search options not deleted
user 4008
Continuum theory, point-set topology, spaces with algebraic structure, foundations, dimension theory, local and global properties.
17
votes
Accepted
Is the Characteristic of a Field Detectable from the Topology of a Topological Vector Space?
I think all non-archimedean locally compact fields are homeomorphic: Their rings of integers are compact, metric and totally disconnected and hence are all homeomorphic (to the Cantor set). The same i …
- 22.6k
8
votes
On the cohomology of a finite covering map
There is a precise relation at the level of complexes: $C^\ast(X,\mathbb Z)$ is a $G$-complex and as such it is perfect (that is quasi-isomorphic to a finite complex consisting of projective modules) …
- 22.6k
11
votes
Accepted
Topological dimension versus cohomological dimension
Well, I think it depends on which dimension you mean and which cohomology. The best fit I think is covering dimension and Čech cohomology. The Čech cohomological dimension is indeed bounded (more or l …
- 22.6k
15
votes
Confusion over a point in basic category theory
If what you mean by "the category of topological spaces" is the category whose objects are pairs $(S,T)$
where $S$ is a set and $T$ is a topology on $S$ and by topological space you mean a pair $(S,T …
- 22.6k