Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with mereology
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 39865
Atomic Mereology, Gunk Mereology, Mereology with Bottom, General Extensional Mereology, Mereology and Set Theory, Mereotopology, Boundaries, Grounding point free Geometry, Lewis's Mereology, philosophy of Mereology
3
votes
0
answers
184
views
Can we interpret ZFC in GEM?
However, this is unsatisfactory to me, as this seems to conflate the inclusion of mereology with that of set theory. We have no reason to assume that these two inclusion relations are related. … So how do actual systems of mereology hold up? If $\mathcal{M}$ is a model of GEM, then does there exist an interpretation function from $\mathcal{M}$ to some model of ZFC? …
- 433