Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with partitions
Search options not deleted
user 35587
6
votes
Accepted
Computing the lexicographic indices of integer partition
In reverse lex order, it becomes straightforward:
define p(n,k) as the number of partitions of n with largest part k (alternatively with no more than k parts). … To see why this works, look at the transpose partitions counted by p(10,4), p(5,2) etc that are clipped of. …
- 136