Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 31107

Questions where the notion matrix has an important or crucial role (for the latter, note the tag matrix-theory for potential use). Matrices appear in various parts of mathematics, and this tag is typically combined with other tags to make the general subject clear, such as an appropriate top-level tag ra.rings-and-algebras, co.combinatorics, etc. and other tags that might be applicable. There are also several more specialized tags concerning matrices.

6 votes
2 answers
2k views

What is known about the spectrum of a Cauchy matrix?

Math people: A Cauchy matrix is an $m$-by-$n$ matrix $A$ whose elements have the form $a_{i,j} = \frac{1}{x_i-y_j}$, with $x_i \neq y_j$ for all $(i, j)$, and the $x_i$'s and $y_i$'s belong to a fie …
18 votes
3 answers
1k views

looking for proof or partial proof of determinant conjecture

Unfortunately, the determinant of $\frac{\partial M}{\partial B}$ is not the same thing as $\frac{\partial^m d}{\partial B^m}$ (if it were, properties of Cauchy matrices would yield the desired conclusion … Thanks to some comments provided below, unless I am confused, the conjecture can be proven for $B=0$ and large positive $B$, for any $n$, using properties of Cauchy matrices. …