Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 294858
2 votes
Accepted

Interpreting a diagram in Borceux-Quinteiro's paper on enriched sheaves

Ordinary limits in $\mathcal K_0$ and conical limits in $\mathcal K$ exist and coincide whenever $\mathcal K$ has copowers (=tensors); see Kelly's book, page 50. In your case you want $[\mathcal{C}^\t …
Giacomo's user avatar
  • 499
6 votes

Enriched vs ordinary filtered colimits

We deal with Question 1 in this paper, joint with Steve Lack. In general it is not true that every $\kappa$-flat presheaf lies in the closure of the resperesntables under $\kappa$-filtered colimits an …
Giacomo's user avatar
  • 499
4 votes

Classification of absolute 2-limits?

A 2-category is Cauchy complete (in the sense you describe) if and only if idempotents splits, which is, if and only if its underlying ordinary category is Cauchy complete. This holds more generally i …
Giacomo's user avatar
  • 499
7 votes

Relation between Ind-completion and "additive"-ind-completion

The equivalence you mention holds more generally whenever your base of enrichment has a finitely presentable unit. This certainly includes $Ab$ but also many other examples: $Cat$, $sSet$, $GAb$, $DGA …
Giacomo's user avatar
  • 499
6 votes
Accepted

Can every weighted colimit in a $\mathbf{Pos}$-enriched category be rephrased as a conical c...

Consider the terminal object $1\in\mathbf{Pos}$. Then the closure of $1$ in $\mathbf{Pos}$ under all weighted colimits is $\mathbf{Pos}$ itself: If $X\in\mathbf{Pos}$, then $X\cong X\cdot 1$ is the co …
Giacomo's user avatar
  • 499