Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 2733

Philosophical aspects of logic and set theory; truth status of mathematical axioms; Philosophy of Mathematics; philosophical aspects of mathematics in general; relation of mathematics to philosophy; etc. Consider also posting at http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/, where philosophy-of-mathematics is one of the most popular tags.

17 votes

(Fictive) story of a time where people reasoned only up to isomorphism

As Todd has already written an answer for me, maybe I can claim it as an Answer: Exercise 1.1 in my book Practical Foundations of Mathematics (CUP 1999) reads, When Bo Peep got too many sheep to see …
Paul Taylor's user avatar
  • 8,481
0 votes

Extensionality in HoTT versus extensionality in internal language of a category

No, sorry, but you haven't got the point of HoTT. $x \equiv y$ means "$x$ is the same as $y$", so they are terms such that one can be transformed into the other by "rewrite rules" such as expanding o …
Paul Taylor's user avatar
  • 8,481
4 votes

Is rigour just a ritual that most mathematicians wish to get rid of if they could?

Please would somebody better qualified than me to do so write accounts here of Reallisability and Proof Mining.
17 votes

Intuitionistic logic as quantization of classical logic?

MathOverflow is a valuable resource because it is interdisciplinary. Some of the people who have written about this question come from a traditional pure mathematical background where classical logic …
Paul Taylor's user avatar
  • 8,481
24 votes

Categorical foundations without set theory

Since Tom Leinster queries my reference to actual/completed versus potential/incomplete infinities, maybe we should ask a philosopher whether I am using these terms in the standard way. In any case, …
Paul Taylor's user avatar
  • 8,481
46 votes
Accepted

Categorical foundations without set theory

On the subject of categorical versus set-theoretic foundations there is too much complicated discussion about structure that misses the essential point about whether "collections" are necessary. It d …
Paul Taylor's user avatar
  • 8,481