Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with localization
Search options not deleted
user 24965
3
votes
0
answers
246
views
The multiplicative system in a symmetric monoidal category
And can we define a localization along this more general multiplicative system? …
- 9,019
4
votes
0
answers
105
views
Could we form the homotopy category of a dg-category by inverting homotopic invertible morph...
Let $k$ be a field and $\mathcal{C}$ be a dg-category over $k$. It is standard to define the homotopy category $H^0(\mathcal{C})$ as the category consisting the same objects as $\mathcal{C}$ but morph …
- 9,019
4
votes
0
answers
171
views
Do we have criteria of strict localization of a Grothendieck category?
Similarly we call a full subcategory $\mathcal{L}$ of an abelian category $\mathcal{C}$ a strict localization if the inclusion functor $i: \mathcal{L}\to \mathcal{C}$ has an exact left adjoint $a: \mathcal … My question is: When $\mathcal{C}$ is a Grothendieck category, do we have an explicit criterion on what kind of full subcategory $\mathcal{L}$ of $\mathcal{C}$ is a strict localization? …
- 9,019