Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 2481

rigid analytic varieties, affinoid varieties, strictly convergent power series over non-archimedean fields

7 votes
0 answers
228 views

Rigid cohomology with support and dagger spaces

Let $K$ be a $p$-adic field with residue field $k$, and $X$ a variety over $k$. The rigid cohomology of $X$ over $k$ can be described very neatly using Grosse--Kloenne's notion of dagger spaces: embed …
David Loeffler's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
391 views

Is this subset of a rigid space an admissible open?

Let $K$ be a $p$-adic field and let $X$ be the rigid space $ \operatorname{Max} K\langle T_1, T_2 \rangle$, i.e. the 2-dimensional closed unit ball. Consider the sets $U := \{ |T_1| < 1\}$ and $V := …
David Loeffler's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
474 views

Rigid versus log-rigid cohomology for semistable varieties

If $K$ is a p-adic field, with maximal unramified subfield $K_0$, and $X$ is a proper semi-stable $O_K$-scheme, then there's a canonical way to make the special fibre $X_k$ into a log-scheme; and ther …
David Loeffler's user avatar
4 votes

complement of "good reduction" points in p-adic shimura varieties

This is an algebraic question disguised as a rigid-analytic one: what you're asking for is a description of the $\mathbf{Z}_p$-scheme $X^{\star} - X$, the boundary of the arithmetic minimal compactifi …
David Loeffler's user avatar
31 votes
Accepted

Are rigid-analytic spaces obsolete, since adic spaces exist?

There are two questions here: which version of the theory is easiest to get off the ground axiomatically, and which version is more convenient to work with in applications? For the first question, it' …
David Loeffler's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Overconvergent modular forms and the level at $p$

The curve $X_1(Np^n)$ is connected, but the ordinary locus in this curve is not: if you remove the residue discs of the supersingular points, what's left "falls apart" into a disjoint union of several …
David Loeffler's user avatar