Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with non-archimedean-fields
Search options not deleted
user 2481
5
votes
0
answers
391
views
Is this subset of a rigid space an admissible open?
Let $K$ be a $p$-adic field and let $X$ be the rigid space $ \operatorname{Max} K\langle T_1, T_2 \rangle$, i.e. the 2-dimensional closed unit ball.
Consider the sets $U := \{ |T_1| < 1\}$ and $V := …
- 37k
31
votes
Accepted
Are rigid-analytic spaces obsolete, since adic spaces exist?
There are two questions here: which version of the theory is easiest to get off the ground axiomatically, and which version is more convenient to work with in applications?
For the first question, it' …
- 37k