Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
for questions about motives in algebraic geometry, including constructions of categories of motives and motivic sheaves, and aspects of the standard conjectures.
2
votes
0
answers
173
views
Transformation rule for motivic integration: divisors or divisors classes?
In the Kontsevich's 'change of variables for motivic integral' rule does one consider any possible choices for the corresponding canonical divisors, or is it necessary to fix certain representatives i …
5
votes
0
answers
176
views
Can a Chow motif be isomorphic to its own direct summand?
Let $M$ be a $R$-linear Chow motif over a field $k$ that is perfect but not necessarily algebraically closed. Can one prove that $M$ is not a direct summand of itself (that is, $M\not\cong M\bigoplus …
4
votes
Etale Realization and Gysin Sequence
Yes, it is.:) Gysin triangles (along with orientable cohomology theories) were studied in detail in several papers of Deglise. For example, have a look at section 4 of http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/frederi …
2
votes
Grothendieck's letter to Faltings: On the yoga of motives and the degeneration of Leray spec...
Well, everything follows from the fact that the total direct image $Rf_*\mathbb{Q}$ splits as the direct sum of its (shifted, co)homology sheaves (so, it is "formal"). Now, this statement can be prove …
1
vote
Accepted
Why is the triangulated category of motives easier than the abelian one?
On the other hand, to obtain an abelian category motives you should "enforce" certain long exact sequences (of symbols of the form $H^i(V)$), and I doubt that any general formalism allows this. …
1
vote
Motivic class of mixed Tate motive
Now, the latter statement is a consequence of the existence of a (Chow) weight structure on $DMT(k;R)$ whose heart consists on Chow-Tate motives; these are direct sums of $R(i)[2i]=\mathbb L^{\otimes i …
3
votes
What is motivic sheaf intuitively?
The problem is that is really difficult to define mixed motives (even over an algebraically closed field). … Note that the original idea of Grothendieck is that motives should be "defined in terms of varieties". And this is more or less the case for triangulated motivic categories. …
6
votes
0
answers
461
views
Is singular cohomology representable by a (Voevodsky's) motivic complex?
For any $c>0$ does there exist an object $C$ of Voevodsky's $DM^{eff}_-$ (over the field of complex numbers) such that for any $i\le c$ and any smooth variety $X$ the $i$-th singular cohomology of $X$ …
8
votes
1
answer
722
views
The conjectural relation between mixed motivic sheaves and the perverse t-structure.
As far as I remember, there 'should exist' an exact etale realization functor from the category of mixed motivic sheaves (over a base scheme $S$) to the category of perverse $l$-adic sheaves over $S$. …
4
votes
Functor between categories of motives
$) exists if $f$ is smooth (thus, it should be finite and separable if you consider motives over fields). …
1
vote
0
answers
116
views
On "splitting off small weights" from Chow motives
I am interested in certain properties Chow motives that seem to be (more or less) "classical" (so, I mostly need references; the base field may be assumed to be algebraically closed). … So, consider the full subcategories $C_{\le 1}$ and $C_{\ge 2}$ of effective Chow motives with rational coefficients consisting of objects whose ($\mathbb{Q}_l$-adic for l being a fixed prime distinct …
9
votes
What exactly do the standard conjectures in characteristic zero refer to?
Any characteristic zero field is an inductive limit of fields that can be embedded into complex numbers (i.e., those of characteristic 0 and of cardinality at most continuum). Hence the assumption t …
4
votes
Intuition for the Lefschetz motive (Tate motive)?
Since motives of affine lines are "trivial", the latter morphism yields the isomorphism in question. … If you want to study "ordinary motives", look at Hodge structures, yes. …
4
votes
Some questions about the map $K_0(\text{Var})\to K_0(\text{Mot})$
(1) As pointed out by Marc Hoyois, there is a natural homomorphism $K_0(Var)\to K_0(DM^{gm})$, where $DM^{gm}$ is the category of geometric Voevodsky motives with coefficients in any (commutative unital … ) ring $R$; you should only assume (at our current level of knowledge on the resolution of singularities) that the base field characteristic $p$ is invertible in $R$ (to put Borel-Moore motives into $DM …
5
votes
Why would the category of Motives be Tannakian?
Also, Tannakian categories give a possibility of dealing with the category of motives "abstractly". … Lastly, Theorem 4.22 gives a very funny functor from the so-called CM-motives over the algebraic closure of $\mathbb{Q}$ into motives over $\mathbb{F}$; this result crucially depends on the language of …