Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 21291

Questions about the branch of algebra that deals with groups.

6 votes
Accepted

Elements of Coxeter group whose simple reflections pairwise commute

If I see it correctly, there is not much going on in the set $X(G)$ from the viewpoint of Coxeter systems: Let $S$ be the simple system and let $G$ be the Coxeter graph of $(W,S)$ with vertex set $S$. …
Christian Stump's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Do we have a one to one correspondence between positive roots and reflections in a Coxeter g...

I suggest, you really look carefully into the reference "Humphreys, Reflection and Coxeter groups" (link behind paywall), as you again find the answer there. Please look into the reference for details …
Christian Stump's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

References request: reflections in coxeter groups

As you find in "Humphreys, Reflection and Coxeter groups" (link behind paywall) in Section 5.7, the set of reflections of a Coxeter system $(W,S)$ is given by $R = \{ wsw^{-1} : w \in W, s \in S\}$, t …
Christian Stump's user avatar
6 votes

A decomposition of $w_0$ which is similar to the reduced decomposition

Consider the (strong) Bruhat order on the symmetric group: This order is defined for $a,b \in \mathcal{S}_n$ as $a \leq b$ if $\ell(a) < \ell(b)$ and $at=b$ for a transposition $t$. Therefore, your f …
Christian Stump's user avatar
4 votes

Uniform proof that a finite (irreducible real) reflection group is determined by its degrees?

As it is not clearly stated here so far: As far as I know there is still no conceptual explanation of this observation. We were looking at this situation for unitary reflection groups in Proposition 2 …
Christian Stump's user avatar