Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 19729

Commutative rings, modules, ideals, homological algebra, computational aspects, invariant theory, connections to algebraic geometry and combinatorics.

5 votes
Accepted

Flag complexes that are shellable but not vertex decomposable

I'm very slow to respond, but have finally found some time to put your complex into GAP and examine it. Questions on $k$-decomposability on flag complexes There were two questions about $k$-decompos …
Russ Woodroofe's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

Reference request on Leray numbers

For question 1, the earliest reference I know is: Ralf Fröberg, On Stanley-Reisner rings, Topics in algebra, Part 2 (Warsaw, 1988), Banach Center Publ., vol. 26, PWN, Warsaw, 1990, pp. 57–70. (This …
Russ Woodroofe's user avatar
3 votes

How a "sequentially Cohen–Macaulay" simplicial complex relates to "Cohen–Macaulay" simplicia...

This answer will give a slightly different approach to the question, in terms of depth. A definition of a Cohen-Macaulay ring $R$ is that $\operatorname{depth} R = \dim R$. There is also a good topo …
Russ Woodroofe's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Shedding vertex

In the case of a shedding vertex $v$, $\operatorname{reg} I(G) = \max \{ \operatorname{reg} I(G \setminus N[v]) + 1, \operatorname{reg} I(G\setminus v) \}$, by a theorem of myself and Tài Hà. So your …
Russ Woodroofe's user avatar
2 votes

Regularity of special monomial ideals

Doesn't a "yes" answer for your first question follow straightforwardly from facts about the lcm lattice? See e.g. Nevo's "Regularity of edge ideals of $C_4$ free graphs via the topology of the lcm l …
Russ Woodroofe's user avatar
1 vote

lattice of subalgebras of a finite commutative algebra

(Building on Goldstern's comment:) If fields are ok, (and if you allow infinite algebras -- see comment by Mariano Suárez-Alvarez below) then the distributivity certainly does not hold. Take e.g. a …
Russ Woodroofe's user avatar