Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Commutative rings, modules, ideals, homological algebra, computational aspects, invariant theory, connections to algebraic geometry and combinatorics.
5
votes
Integer Gelfand-Kirillov dimension
You might find this paper:
Agata Smoktunowicz, MR 2221134 There are no graded domains with GK dimension strictly between 2 and 3, Invent. Math. 164 (2006), no. 3, 635--640.
together with its referen …
5
votes
Accepted
What are the cluster algebra structures on $Gr(3,5)$?
The canonical source for the cluster structure on (all) Grassmannians is the aptly-titled
Joshua S. Scott, MR 2205721 Grassmannians and cluster algebras, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 92 (2006), no. 2, …
5
votes
Accepted
Nondegenerate pairings versus perfect pairings for finitely generated projective modules
No: for $R=\mathbb{Z}$ and even for $M,N$ both free (i.e. free Abelian groups), non-degenerate doesn't imply perfect. (You get finite index sublattices, so torsion quotients, unlike the case of vector …