Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
This tag is used if a reference is needed in a paper or textbook on a specific result.
15
votes
2
answers
739
views
$\mu$-presentable object as $\mu$-small colimit of $\lambda$-presentable objects
Remark 1.30 of Adámek and Rosický, Locally Presentable and Accessible Categories claims that in any locally $\lambda$-presentable category, each $\mu$-presentable object (for $\mu\ge\lambda$) can be w …
9
votes
What is a reference for an explicit, logic-based, statement of duality in category theory (i...
I would go even farther than the comments above, at least in the specific case you mention about computing (co)limits objectwise in a functor category. Once you know the statement for limits, deducin …
3
votes
References/literature for pushouts in category of commutative monoids? [ed. - amalgams]
I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for, but here is a somewhat weird example of a pushout in commutative monoids I recently came across:
$\begin{matrix}
\mathbb{N}&\to&\mathbb{Z}\\\\
\downarrow …
10
votes
$\mu$-presentable object as $\mu$-small colimit of $\lambda$-presentable objects
Here's an argument which I currently believe. As Tim suggested, it does use the fat small object argument. References are to that paper.
Let $\mathcal{K}$ be a locally $\lambda$-presentable category …
7
votes
1
answer
210
views
Simplicial localization of the cofibrant-fibrant objects
Let $M$ be a model category. I don't assume that $M$ has functorial factorizations or that $M$ is simplicial. Write $M^{c}$ (respectively, $M^{cf}$) for the full subcategory of $M$ on the cofibrant ob …
3
votes
The Grothendieck plus construction for stacks of n-types
This is discussed in section 3.4.3 of https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.00731 by Mathieu Anel and Chaitanya Leena Subramaniam.
3
votes
Cofibrations of functors
When $\mathcal{M}$ and $\mathcal{N}$ are combinatorial, this class $\mathcal{C}$ is indeed the left class of a weak factorization system on the category of all left adjoints from $\mathcal{M}$ to $\ma …