Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 12547

Homotopy theory is an important sub-field of algebraic topology. It is mainly concerned with the properties and structures of spaces which are invariant under homotopy. Chief among these are the homotopy groups of spaces, specifically those of spheres. Homotopy theory includes a broad set of ideas and techniques, such as cohomology theories, spectra and stable homotopy theory, model categories, spectral sequences, and classifying spaces.

19 votes
2 answers
2k views

Does the bordism homology theory satisfy the weak equivalence axiom?

There is an interesting and important homology theory called bordism. Briefly speaking, a singular manifold in a space $X$ is a pair $(M, f)$ where $M$ is a closed smooth manifold and $f : M \to X$ is …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
16 votes
Accepted

On a weaker version of homotopy equivalence between topological spaces

Saying that there are maps $f \colon X \to Y$ and $g \colon Y \to X$ such that $g f$ is homotopic to $\mathrm{id}_X$ means that $X$ is a homotopy retract of $Y$. (By the way, we say that maps are homo …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

Can homotopy pullbacks of spaces be checked on fibers?

$\require{AMScd}$I don't know a reference but the proof is easy enough. Form homotopy pullback squares \begin{CD} Fu @>>> Ff @>>> A \\ @VVV @VVV @V{u}VV \\ * @>>> Fg @>>> P @>>> B \\ @. @VVV @VVV @VV …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

Constructing a "geometric" model structure on Cat by localizing the "categorical" model stru...

No, there are far too many "canonical cofibrations" for that. For example, let $A$ be a category with two objects and two parallel arrows between them. Then there is a unique functor $A \to [1]$ that …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
14 votes
Accepted

When are (weak) homotopy equivalence testable on open covers?

For weak homotopy equivalences this holds always (Theorem 6.7.9 in tom Dieck's Algebraic Topology). For homotopy equivalences this holds provided the open covers are numerable (Theorem 4.2.7 loc. cit …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
12 votes
Accepted

When do colimits agree with homotopy colimits?

I don't think we can expect to have one general answer to this question, only a collection of unrelated specialized results. Here are two more: In the category of simplicial sets all filtered colimi …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
10 votes
Accepted

Can a weak fibration category be non saturated?

It is a result of Cisinski that in a fibration category the three conditions you mention (saturation, 2-out-of-6, weak equivalences closed under retracts) are all equivalent. See Theorem 7.2.7 in this …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
10 votes
Accepted

Relative version of Quillen's theorem A

The condition that appears in the assumption of what you call "Relative Theorem A" was introduced by Grothendieck in Pursuing Stacks. It is a part of the definition of a basic localizer, i.e. a class …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
9 votes
Accepted

When does localization preserve homotopy type of classifying spaces?

You can find some sufficient conditions in terms of simplicial localization of Dwyer and Kan. In Prop. 3.7 of Simplicial Localizations of Categories they prove that it holds when $\Sigma$ is free and …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Homotopy pullbacks/relative homotopy groups vs homotopy pushouts/relative homology groups

Relative homotopy groups are the homotopy groups of the homotopy fiber. A homotopy pullback square induces an equivalence of the homotopy fibers of two of its parellel maps by the cancellation propert …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
526 views

Localizations of non-nilpotent spaces

For simplicity let's talk about $p$-localizations of spaces for a fixed prime $p$. Every space $X$ has a well-defined $p$-localization which can be constructed by the small object argument and which b …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

When does simplicial localization commute with functor categories?

For general $C$ (I will drop $W$ from the notation) this is not true even when $D$ is an infinite discrete category. In the answer to this similar question I described how to construct a sequence of …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Sheaf cohomology invariant of weak homotopy type?

No. For paracompact spaces sheaf cohomology coincides with Čech cohomology. In particular it applies to the closed topologist's sine curve $C$. There is a map $C \to S^1$ inducing an isomorphism on Če …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Do finite simplicial sets jointly detect isomorphisms in the homotopy category?

The answer is no. Otherwise, it would follow from Brown's representability theorem (and here I mean very specifically Theorem 2.8 from Brown's 1965 paper Abstract Homotopy Theory) that every "half-exa …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar
7 votes

Can one make the category of pairs of topological spaces a model category?

As Tyler Lawson points out you can use the category of all diagrams on $[1]$. Then the projective and injective model structures are both instances of Reedy model structures. This is discussed in Sect …
Karol Szumiło's user avatar

15 30 50 per page