Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with ag.algebraic-geometry
Search options not deleted
user 120924
Algebraic varieties, stacks, sheaves, schemes, moduli spaces, complex geometry, quantum cohomology.
2
votes
0
answers
116
views
Do integral curves on simple abelian surfaces define big line bundles?
Let $A$ be a simple abelian surface over $\mathbb{C}$.
Let $C\subset A$ be an irreducible and reduced one-dimensional closed subscheme. Since $A$ is simple, the normalization of $C$ is of genus at le …
- 57
2
votes
0
answers
98
views
Why do "large" opens of abelian surfaces have "small" canonical bundle?
Let $A$ be an abelian surface, and let $S$ be a finite set of points. Let $U=A\setminus S$. Note that $U$ is a "large" open of $A$.
Let $B\to A$ be a proper birational surjective morphism with $B$ sm …
- 57