Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with large-cardinals
Search options not deleted
user 113405
8
votes
Accepted
Large cardinal near inconsistencies
I would argue that a "restricting versions" of large cardinals are such.
Starting from the top down, we have the inconsistent Berkeley cardinals:
$κ$ is Berkeley if for every transitive $M\ni\kappa$ …
- 1,676
6
votes
Can we iteratively reflect on self elementary embeddable stages of the cumulative hierarchy?
Any model of $ZF$+stationary proper class of $I3$ ordinals (whose consistency strength is at most $ZF$+$I2$) where $W_α$ is listing of $V_{κ}$ where $κ$ is $I3$ and $j_α$ the witness of $I3(V_κ)$ will …
- 1,676
3
votes
Accepted
Can we iteratively reflect on self elementary embeddable stages of the cumulative hierarchy?
$\newcommand\Ord{\mathit{Ord}}$The edit to the question has changed it enough so I think it deserves its own answer.
I assume that in reflection we have $\forall \vec{x} \in W_\alpha \, (\phi \to \ph …
- 1,676