Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with real-analysis
Search options not deleted
user 103342
Real-valued functions of real variable, analytic properties of functions and sequences, limits, continuity, smoothness of these.
1
vote
Accepted
Ensuring the measure condition $\mu(E) = \lambda$ in a lemma: need some clarification regard...
If $\mu(E)\geq\lambda$ you can choose a subset $E'$ with $\mu(E')>\lambda$. The following exhaustion argument ensures you can have an $E$ with $\mu(E)>\lambda$.
Do as you said and get an $E$. If $\mu( …
- 111