Skip to main content
2 of 3
grammar, spelling, non is not a word, punctuation
David Handelman
  • 4.7k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 35

Counterexample to Riesz representation for Hilbert modules

For a Hilbert space $H$, the Riesz representation theorem states that $H$ is isomorphic to its dual $H^*$ via $x \mapsto \langle x, -\rangle$.

It is often stated in the literature that this does not work in full generality for a Hilbert module over a $C^*$ algebra. For example, attempts to define the adjoint of a morphism between Hilbert modules run into the lack of such a representation theorem. To avoid this, we insist that a morphism between Hilbert modules admit an adjoint.

Is there a simple counterexample to Riesz representability for Hilbert modules?