Skip to main content
5 of 5
deleted 20 characters in body
user2013
  • 1.7k
  • 11
  • 20

A question on chiral rings and geometry of the vacuum bundle

I am reading "Mirror Symmetry" by Hori et al, and have a question on Chap.17 (Chiral rings and geometry of the vacuum bundle). On p.425 the authors say

Consider the path-integral on the hemisphere. The boundary of the hemisphere is a circle on which our Hilbert space is based. The path-integral will give us a number, and so defines a functional from boundary filed configurations to numbers, equivalently, a state in the Hilbert space...

Then they say

To obtain a ground state at the boundary we consider the "neck" of the hemisphere to be infinitely stretched. In other words, we imagine connecting the hemisphere to a semi-infinite flat tube. Noe that on the flat tube the twisted and untwisted theories are equivalent.

They continue

... Similarly, if we consider the topological path-integral together with the insertion of the corresponding chiral fields, we obtain a correspondence between chiral fields and the ground state....

Insertion of chiral field

I am lost because they suddenly introduce the hemisphere and identify the states with the Hilbert space on the boundary.

Question 1 Should I think of this hemisphere as a Riemann surface? Or is this the operator formalism and manifolds with boundary?

Question 2 Why are the twisted and untwisted theories equivalent on the flat tube?

Question 3 What does it mean by inserting chiral field? I don't think this is explained anywhere in the book. Does the insertion mean that the operator acts on the field after some time corresponding to the position of the insertion?

I think I lack of firm understanding of the subject, so I would appreciate it if someone could kindly explain things from the very basic.

user2013
  • 1.7k
  • 11
  • 20