Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
6 votes
1 answer
248 views

Adjoints to inclusion pseudofunctors from topoi to Cat

Let's consider the bicategories, LogTopos of elementary topoi, logical functors and natural transformations and GrTopos of Grothendieck topoi, geometric morphisms and natural transformations. The ...
Ilk's user avatar
  • 1,347
8 votes
0 answers
221 views

When is the Eilenberg-Moore category of a relative monad between two topoi a topos?

In the non-relative case, we have a theorem, that an Eilenberg-Moore category of algebras of a Monad $T$ on a topos is itself a topos if the monad in question has a right adjoint. Now how does this ...
Ilk's user avatar
  • 1,347
5 votes
0 answers
189 views

When are topoi of coalgebras atomic?

A geometric morphism is atomic if its inverse image is logical. Now consider a Grothendieck topos $\varepsilon$ and its terminal geometric morphism $\Gamma : \varepsilon \rightarrow Set$, topos is ...
Ilk's user avatar
  • 1,347
2 votes
0 answers
94 views

What can be said about the free-forgetful adjunction of monad algebras with respect to topoi?

For a monad T on a topos E, if T has a right adjoint, then the Eilenberg-Moore category of algebras of T is equivalent to the co-Eilenberg-Moore category of co-algebras for the right adjoint comonad ...
Ilk's user avatar
  • 1,347
3 votes
0 answers
83 views

Cohesive structure of Cahiers and Dubuc topoi

The inclusion of commutative rings into supercommutative rings has two adjoints, one projecting out the even part and the other quotienting out the ideal generated by odd elements. After passing to ...
NDewolf's user avatar
  • 193
3 votes
0 answers
97 views

When do geometric morphisms lead to periodic adjoints?

This may be a naïve question but I've been unable to locate a reference that addresses it. Any thoughts are appreciated! Let $f:\mathcal{E}\to\mathcal{S}$ be a cohesive morphism of toposes. That is, ...
Andrew Dudzik's user avatar
21 votes
1 answer
2k views

Surmounting set-theoretical difficulties in algebraic geometry

The category $\text{AffSch}_S$ of affine schemes over some base affine scheme $S$ is not essentially small. This lends itself to certain set-theoretical difficulties when working with a category $Sh(\...
Exit path's user avatar
  • 3,019
10 votes
0 answers
317 views

Adjoints to forcing

Forcing over a partial order $P$ can be viewed in a category theoretic sense as constructing the presheaf topos ${\bf Set}^{P^{op}}$ over the partial order (viewed as a category) then passing through ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 10.1k