Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
0 answers
261 views

Is this theory using defined notions of classes, sets, and membership interpretable in ZFC?

The main difference with this formal theory is that it depends in an essential manner on a defined notion of class, set, and set membership $\in$, rather than the usual appraoch of leaving them ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
-3 votes
1 answer
341 views

What is the intuitive notion that ZF-Extensionality-Foundation+Collection can be said to capture? [closed]

This question has been moved to philosophy.stackexchange.com I'll try to abbreviate it here: the question asks about the "informal notion" that the fragment of $\text{ZFC}$ that is axiomatized by ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
55 votes
10 answers
11k views

How should a "working mathematician" think about sets? (ZFC, category theory, urelements)

Note that "a working mathematician" is probably not the best choice of words, it's supposed to mean "someone who needs the theory for applications rather than for its own sake". Think about it as a ...
Jxt921's user avatar
  • 1,115
13 votes
0 answers
882 views

Arguments against Freiling's argument against Continuum Hypothesis

Freiling's axiom of symmetry ($\sf AS$) is known as a justification for falsity of Continuum Hypothesis. Freiling in his 1986 paper, Axioms of symmetry: throwing darts at the real number line, ...
Morteza Azad's user avatar
60 votes
8 answers
10k views

Why should we believe in the axiom of regularity?

Today I started reading Maddy's Believing the axioms. As I knew beforehand, it includes some discussion of ZFC axioms. However, I really hoped for a more extensive discussion of axiom of foundation/...
Wojowu's user avatar
  • 28.2k