Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
20 votes
1 answer
2k views

Are flat morphisms of analytic spaces open?

Let $f:X\to Y$ be a morphism of complex analytic spaces. Assume $f$ is flat (or, more generally, that there is a coherent sheaf on $X$ with support $X$ which is $f$-flat). Is $f$ an open map? The ...
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
577 views

What lies between algebraic geometry and analytic geometry?

Algebraic geometry and analytic geometry are closely related (witness GAGA). But the latter still seems much "bigger" than the former. I'd like to be able to get from algebraic geometry to ...
Tim Campion's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
2k views

Generalized GAGA

So, I have heard GAGA works for Rigid Analytic spaces. I know next to nothing about this, but it made me curious as to whether there are any other contexts in which GAGA "works". Of course, this is a ...
Ian M.'s user avatar
  • 373
4 votes
1 answer
421 views

Representability of relative Hilbert and Picard functors over analytic spaces

Let $f:X \to S$ be a morphism of complex analytic spaces. Then, just like in the case of schemes, we can define the relative Hilbert and Picard functors. For instance, if $\text{An}_{/S}$ denotes de ...
user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
321 views

Can we see the completion of a scheme along a subscheme as an adic space?

Classically, formal schemes were invented to study completions of schemes along closed subschemes. Eventually, people started using them for more arithmetical reasons. (I.e., to study non-archimedean ...
Gabriel's user avatar
  • 773
3 votes
1 answer
307 views

How to show analytification functor commutes with forgetful functor?

Let $k$ be a field complete with respect to a non-trivial non-archimedean absolute value (so that rigid $k$-space makes sense). Denote $K$ a finite field extension of $k$. Denote $X\rightsquigarrow X^{...
Z Wu's user avatar
  • 452
1 vote
1 answer
209 views

Reference request: Gruson's theorem on the tensor product of Banach spaces over a non-Archimedean field

I am looking for a reference for theorem 3.21 of these notes: https://web.math.princeton.edu/~takumim/Berkovich.pdf The theorem states that if $k$ is a non-Archimedean field and $X$ and $Y$ are $k$-...
Dcoles's user avatar
  • 63
1 vote
0 answers
183 views

Contractibility of the quotient of an analytification of a smooth variety by a finite group (if the field is trivially valued)

Let $k$ be a field and $X$ be a smooth irreducible $k$-variety with an action of a finite group $G$. I consider $k$ as a trivially valued field. It is known from results of Berkovich ("Smooth p-...
Sam's user avatar
  • 41