Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
3 votes
1 answer
261 views

Why finite dimensional MCS-space implies $\mathbb{R}^m\times cone$ locally?

Frequently, I see a statment of the result in reference that a finite dimensional Alexandrov spaces is locally a product $\mathbb{R}^m\times cone$. It seems that this result comes from Perelman's ...
Lewis Zhang's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
444 views

Topological spaces admitting CAT(1) metrics

Suppose that $X$ is a locally contractible completely metrizable topological space. Is it true that $X$ can be metrized as a (complete) CAT(1) metric space? The only result in this direction I know is ...
Moishe Kohan's user avatar
  • 12.3k
6 votes
3 answers
2k views

Uniquely geodesic and CAT(0) spaces?

Improvement after J-M Schlenker's comment below : This post has been divided into two parts, the second part is here. Question : Is a finite dimensional metric space, uniquely geodesic if and only ...
Sebastien Palcoux's user avatar