All Questions
3 questions
3
votes
1
answer
261
views
Why finite dimensional MCS-space implies $\mathbb{R}^m\times cone$ locally?
Frequently, I see a statment of the result in reference that a finite dimensional Alexandrov spaces is locally a product $\mathbb{R}^m\times cone$. It seems that this result comes from Perelman's ...
11
votes
1
answer
444
views
Topological spaces admitting CAT(1) metrics
Suppose that $X$ is a locally contractible completely metrizable topological space. Is it true that $X$ can be metrized as a (complete) CAT(1) metric space?
The only result in this direction I know is ...
6
votes
3
answers
2k
views
Uniquely geodesic and CAT(0) spaces?
Improvement after J-M Schlenker's comment below :
This post has been divided into two parts, the second part is here.
Question : Is a finite dimensional metric space, uniquely geodesic if and only ...