All Questions
5 questions
18
votes
1
answer
682
views
De Rham via topoi
Étale cohomology of schemes $X$ is constructed as follows: one associates to $X$ the so-called étale topos of $X$, and then one just takes the sheaf cohomology of that topos.
Is it possible to ...
9
votes
1
answer
392
views
Integrating hypercohomology classes
Let $X$ be a complex variety. By Poincare's lemma, its singular cohomology can be computed as hypercohomology of the holomorphic de Rham complex (viewing $X$ as a complex manifold)
$$\text{H}^\cdot(X,\...
1
vote
0
answers
303
views
Berthelot-Ogus comparison isomorphism
On the link, page, $ 2 $, the Berthlot-Ogus isomorphism theorem is stated as follows,
We have a canonical isomorphism, $$ \rho_{\mathrm{cris}} \ : \ H_{\mathrm{cris}}^{i} (X) \otimes_{K_ {0}} K \to H_{...
1
vote
0
answers
348
views
Vanishing of cohomology groups
Given a smooth hypersurface $X \subset \mathbb{P}^{2p+1}_{\mathbb{C}}$ of degree $d \ge 5$ (with $p\ge 2$), when can we say that
$H^{p+1}(\mathcal{O}_X)=H^{p+1}(\Omega^1_X)=...=H^{p+1}(\Omega^{p-2}...
4
votes
0
answers
441
views
Finite Field Varieties and the de Rham Complex of Kähler Differentials
In an answer to a previous question I asked, where the Kahler differentials of a variety over a finite field were discussed, it was stated that:
You can certainly define de Rham cohomology using ...