Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
5 votes
0 answers
276 views

Log-concavity of lattice-functions and convolution

I was looking at the definition of log-concavity: A function $F:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ is said log-concave iff $F(x)\geq 0\forall x\in\mathbb{R}^n$ and $$F(x)^\lambda F(y)^{1-\lambda}\leq ...
Rafael's user avatar
  • 93
3 votes
1 answer
316 views

Can it be represented by convolution and multiplication

I have functions $A, B, F, S$ that are zero on $(-\infty, 0)$. And I have successfully represented the below equation as convolution and multiplication: $\int_0^t {dt_1} \int_0^t {dt_2} B(t - t_2)F(...
J.G. Kang's user avatar
11 votes
0 answers
161 views

Bijections $\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}$ with vanishing local means

This is just a summer-time curiosity arisen after a recent question by Dominic van der Zypen. For a finite subset $S$ of $\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}$ and a function $f$ on $\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{...
Pietro Majer's user avatar
  • 60.6k
-3 votes
1 answer
339 views

How to prove the combinatorial equality? [closed]

Please, help me to understand following convolution (or give a reference): $$ \sum_{R=0}^N \binom{R}{r} \binom{N-R}{n-r} = \binom{N+1}{n+1} $$ Why is it true? Thank you!
ilya.gromov's user avatar