Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It has been my general desire for a few years to acquire the basics in other European languages for the purpose of reading some of the classics in their original language, in a similar vein to this topic. I never pursued a whole lot, and so my knowledge of exactly what those classics might be for a particular language never developed very far. In anticipation for a trip to Lyon this summer I have begun to learn a little French, and would be very interested in reading some of the more palatable (in the sense of a reader who is fairly naive to the language) French texts. My first instincts would be Cauchy and Lebesgue, seeing as I am more analytically inclined, but I have no idea where to start or which of their works are readily available.

share|cite|improve this question
As for the texts themselves, here is a useful link (complete works) : .( – js21 May 25 '12 at 19:38
@js Cool, I had no idea! – Igor Rivin May 25 '12 at 20:04
In what fields of mathematics are you interested ? – Lierre May 31 '12 at 17:01
@Lierre , My current work is in math bio, but I also have an interest in operator theory. – Greg Zitelli Jun 11 '12 at 21:44

11 Answers 11

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Since you mention Lebesgue, I would recommend the following two classics, which build on his lectures at the Collège de France :

Leçons sur l'intégration

Leçons sur les séries trigonométriques

Another suggestions : Topologie générale by Bourbaki, and Théorie des distrbutions by Laurent Schwartz.

share|cite|improve this answer
It's strange to mention Laurent Schwartz's Théorie des distributions and Bourbaki in the same sentence. I found Schwartz very readable with lots of useful and interesting material, but never managed to read much of Bourbaki before becoming bored. Have a look at Schwartz's first article on distributions to get a feeling for how readable he writes:… – Thomas Klimpel May 27 '12 at 21:22
@Thomas : It may depend on which Bourbaki book you chose to read. Personnally I think that Topologie générale is a masterpiece, but some people may have different taste. – François Brunault May 28 '12 at 8:52

The canonical excellent French author is Serre (his books are also quite easy to find) -- Cours d'Arithmetique has some analytic content, if you like that sort of thing, as you say you do...

share|cite|improve this answer
Just for the purpose of uniqueness: this Serre is Jean-Pierre Serre – Denis Serre May 25 '12 at 19:40
Yes. Of course @Denis Serre has some pretty nice books himself (available in both languages, for ease of learning!) – Igor Rivin May 25 '12 at 20:04

I suggest that you have a look at Bourbaki's talks here as they range quite a few topics, are generally short enough, are often in french, and are regularly from masters. Of course, you'll find other interesting collections on the same website.

share|cite|improve this answer

Roger Godement. His courses (in analysis, differential geometry, algebra, etc.) are magnificient.

share|cite|improve this answer

If you're looking for French classics, I would recommend Darboux's Théorie générale des surfaces There is a lot of analysis there. In fact the text is mostly about the interplay between differential equations and differential geometry. Goursat's Leçons d'analyse are also quite nice. I read somewhere that Bourbaki started as a rejection to this text, but that only makes it more interesting. I also like Appell and Goursat's Théorie des fonctions algébriques et leurs intégrales. Appell's books on mechanics are really nice as well.

share|cite|improve this answer

Actually Borel wrote a series of very nice little books, around 1900's. One of them is called "Sur les series de Taylor a coefficient positive". It has some very nice theorem, many of which are forgotten at this day; it reads like a beautifully written paper that just came out.

Also, Paul Levy. He has an exceedingly beautiful writting style. His 7 volume collected works should be available in a math library.

share|cite|improve this answer

Cauchy's Cours d'Analyse is beautifully written, and good for the "analytically inclined". His treatment of infinitesimals is very interesting, and it contains the famous "mistaken proof" that a limit of continuous functions is continuous. There's a CUP reprint, and it is online here

share|cite|improve this answer

Fourier's Théorie analytique de la chaleur is available online here. As an advantage, the English version The Analytical Theory of Heat is available here.

Do not forget François-Marie Arouet de Voltaire, Jules Gabriel Verne, Victor-Marie Hugo, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, Jean-Paul Charles Aymard Sartre, ... :-)

share|cite|improve this answer
Et Balzac ? Et Stendhal ? – Chandan Singh Dalawat May 31 '12 at 15:43
... Émile François Zola, Gustave Flaubert... !!! – Papiro Jun 4 '12 at 10:53

For the really analytically inclined :), while I have not finished reading it myself, I have been told by multiple of my French colleagues that Leray's original paper on Navier-Stokes has interesting mathematics and quite penetrable language.

share|cite|improve this answer
If you don't want to pay Springer 35 Euros, Leray's paper is available here (retypeset) and here (badly scanned) – M T Jun 1 '12 at 12:58
Indeed, my first PDE course involved translating and presenting sections of this paper. As I recall, none of the students nor the professor had French as a first, second, or even third language. It was a challenging but doable endeavour. (Hint: Chaleur is not the name of a professor.) Gerhard "Ne Parle Vouz Francais Still" Paseman, 2012.06.11 – Gerhard Paseman Jun 11 '12 at 21:48

I'm not fit to properly judge the quality of the language, but I've always found Dixmier's papers very lucid (although mathematically demanding for this Bear Of Little Brain). Plus, one gets to see some of the theory of Von Neumann algebras at an interesting time. Looking on NUMDAM ought to yield several papers, including IIRC the paper on $C^k$ functional calculus for self-adjoins elements in $L^1$ of a nilpotent group.

share|cite|improve this answer

For operator theory, Dixmier seems to be a good option.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.