3
$\begingroup$

What should affine and projective schemes over $\mathbf{F}_1$ be?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
4
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Dear OP: Please define $\mathbb{F}_1$, otherwise I feel this question is meaningless. $\endgroup$
    – Jason Starr
    Commented May 9, 2012 at 12:04
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ There is an overview paper on the arxiv: arxiv.org/abs/0909.0069 "Mapping F_1 land". $\endgroup$
    – Lars
    Commented May 9, 2012 at 12:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I vote to close. This question is not precise enough and not really specific. And every one can simply type the question into google and will see that a lot of work has been done in the last years on that. You don't need to ask here to find this. $\endgroup$
    – Martin Brandenburg
    Commented May 9, 2012 at 16:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And of course the paper mentioned by Lars is one of the many points of departure for the literature. $\endgroup$
    – Martin Brandenburg
    Commented May 9, 2012 at 16:29

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1
$\begingroup$

Your question sounds rather vague, but in any case, you might be interested in the paper "On the notion of geometry over $\mathbb{F}_1$" by Alain Connes and Caterina Consani, available on the arXiv (or on Connes' homepage http://www.alainconnes.org).

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.