2
$\begingroup$

I might have misunderstood something I heard somewhere.

Are torsors over unipotent groups trivial?

I couldn't find this in some standard references.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 10
    $\begingroup$ Dear Harry, I don't mean to be rude, but you have really been asking a flurry of questions these last few days! I would suggest both that you mull questions over in your mind and search the literature a bit more before asking here (it builds character), and that you make sure to take the time to digest the answers you have received. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2012 at 9:23
  • $\begingroup$ Alright. I will. $\endgroup$
    – Harry
    Commented Mar 20, 2012 at 9:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Over nonperfect fields there are nontrivial torsors for unipotent groups, e.g., Exercise (3), top of p. 130, Serre's "Galois Cohomology" $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2012 at 11:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Just adding to Jason's comment that over perfect fields the torsors are indeed trivial. $\endgroup$
    – Shripad
    Commented Mar 20, 2012 at 12:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Also an expert reminded me that, if one allows non-smooth "unipotent" groups and torsors in the fppf topology rather than the etale topology, then there are many other examples. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2012 at 13:16

0

You must log in to answer this question.