2
$\begingroup$

Hello, I would appreciate an exact reference / proof of the following fact, which I am almost able to prove, but not really:

Let $A$ be a regular Noetherian comm. ring, of finite Krull dimension. Let $M$ be a f.g. $A$-module. Then $Ext^i (M,A)=0$ for $i < codim(supp(M))$ (codimension of support).

The basic local input should be: for local $A$ as above, $Ext^i(k,A) = 0$ for $i < dim(A)$. But to use it, I localize the above situation to a component of $M$, and get that appropriate $Ext$'s have support "strictly less" than that of $A$ (contained in that of $A$, and does not contain any component of that of $A$). But it does not imply that they are zero.

Also, I tried to do some induction, using "cuts" by local parameters. The problem is that if the support of $M$ is not regular, I can not cut exactly to get it.

Thanks, Sasha

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

For $A$ local, your statement follows from a result of Ischebeck. What you want holds even if $A$ is just Cohen-Macaulay. More generally $\mathrm{Ext}^i_A(M,N)=0$ for $i<\mathrm{depth}\ N-\dim M$. Put $N=A$ and assume $A$ is Cohen-Macaulay, then you get $\mathrm{Ext}^i_A(M,A)=0$ for $i<\dim A-\dim M$.

You can find a proof of Ischebeck Theorem in Matsumura's Commutative Ring Theorey on page 133.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ In fact $\mathrm{dim}(A)-\mathrm{dim}(M)=\mathrm{grade}_A(M)$ if $A$ is local and Cohen-Macaulay! $\endgroup$ – David Hansen Jan 17 '12 at 22:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.