We wish to prove that $$e^{i\pi}+1=0.$$
The standard approach is to use Euler's formula (immediate, for example, from the series definition of the exponential, sine and cosine) and then to use the facts that, $$\sin(\pi)=0\text{, and }\cos(\pi)=-1$$ to draw the necessary conclusion.
But, starting with the series definitions of sine and cosine, I struggle to conclude that $$\sin(\pi)=0\text{, and }\cos(\pi)=-1.$$
The goal is to show that $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(2\pi i)^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}=0,$$ and that $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(2\pi i)^{2n}}{(2n)!}=-1.$$
Attempts by me to prove these relations always end up back where I started. My feeling is that it must somehow come down to some fundamental geometric consideration of the polar description of $\mathbb{C}$ - after all, what is $\pi$ but the circumference of a circle divided by its diameter? Somehow this must be mentioned in any valid proof.
I feel that this issue is not always taken into consideration when a proof of Euler's identity is presented.
Something to gawk at; a Mathematica notebook which plots the partial sums of $e^{ix}$ in the complex plane: ExponentialPartialSumsPlotted.nb