14
$\begingroup$

Given a smooth complex algebraic variety, the Riemann-Hilbert-correspondence tells us, that the category of perverse sheaves is equivalent to the category of regular, holonomic D-modules.

However not every interesting holonomic D-module is regular. For example the solution sheaves of all the $D_{\mathbb A^1}$-modules $\mathbb C[x]e^{\chi x}$ are isomorphic to the constant sheaf and only for $\chi=0$ our module $\mathbb C[x]e^{\chi x}$ is regular.

So my question is, is there an analogue of the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence if we replace regular by something else (and perhaps also perverse sheaves by something else)?

For example in the above example one could do the following: One could fix a $\chi$ and tensor first with $\mathbb C[x] e^{-\chi x} $, before applying the deRham functor. This gives an equivalence between perverse sheaves and holonomic modules with "$e^{-\chi x}$-like " singularities.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

10
$\begingroup$

The answer is yes but it's not easy. You need additional data to describe the irregular part of your connexion. These are known as Stokes structures. Very loosely it's a filtration of your sheaf of solutions according to their growth in a given sector. Very recently, Claude Sabbah has written lecture notes on the subject (arXiv:0912.2762).

$\endgroup$
1
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ It should be added that at the moment a reasonable theory of Stokes structures exists only in dimension 1 (Sabbah mentions some ideas in higher dimensions but there is no theory yet). $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 18, 2010 at 19:10
4
$\begingroup$

I wish to add a bit more reference on this question.

  1. For dimension 1, it can be found in Malgrange's book "equations differentielles a coefficients polynomiaux" P60 Theorem (3.1), that (honomic D module on a curve) is equivalent to the category of (local system outside of singularities, stokes structure on the singularities, some compactibility condition desribed by vanishing cycles). Part I of Sabbah's book "an introduction to stokes structure" also gives a nice introduction.

  2. For higher dimension, Part II of Sabbah's book discusses the case of "good" meromorphic connections.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .