19
$\begingroup$

Is every field the field of fractions of an integral domain which is not itself a field?

What about the field of real numbers?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Yes, every field is its own field of fractions! $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 23, 2010 at 15:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You' re write.I didn't mean the trivial case so i changed the question. $\endgroup$
    – t.k
    Commented Nov 23, 2010 at 15:16
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Then no: pick any field with a prime number of elements. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 23, 2010 at 15:17
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you again. What about infinite fields?And the field of real numbers? $\endgroup$
    – t.k
    Commented Nov 23, 2010 at 15:19

1 Answer 1

31
$\begingroup$

Every field $F$ of characteristic zero or of prime characteristic but not algebraic over its prime field is the field of fractions of a proper subring of $F$. But no algebraic extension of $\mathbb F_p$ is, since its only subrings are fields.

If $F$ is not an algebraic extension of some $\mathbb F_p$ then $F$ contains a subring $A$ isomorphic to $\mathbb Z$ or $\mathbb F_p[X]$. Each of these rings $A$ has a nontrivial valuation $v$. The valuation $v$ can be prolonged to $F$. Its valuation ring is a proper subring of $F$ whose quotient field is $F$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ Variant of the argument: let $B$ be a transcendence basis of $F$. Let $A\subset F$ be the subring generated by $B$. This is a polynomial ring over $\mathbb{Z}$, or a nontrivial polynomial ring over $\mathbb{F}_p$. Now take the integral closure of $A$ in $F$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 23, 2010 at 15:47
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The existence of a prolongation of a valuation to a non algebraic extension field doesn't sem to be mentioned in the standard references (Atiyah, Bourbaki, Matsumura,...). A proof is provided here. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 27, 2016 at 11:44

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .