This question is following the previous question.
Definitions:
Suppose $F$ is an unramified finite extension of $\mathbb Q_p$ and $E$ is an elliptic curve defined over $F$ with good reduction. Denote $V=\mathbb Q_p\otimes_{\mathbb Z_p}T_p(E)$, and consider $D_{cris}(V)$ (by comparison theorem it's equal to $H_{dR}^1(E)$) the Frobenius on $D_{cris}(V)$ is denoted by $\varphi$.
I have the following deduction about the irreducibility of $D_{cris}(V)$ and I wonder if it's right:
By David Loeffler's answer in that post we know the Frobenius on $D_{cris}(V)$ has characteristic polynomial $f(x)=x^2-ax+p$, and by basic theory of elliptic curves we know "$E$ has supersingular reduction" is equivalent to "$a\equiv 0 \pmod p$". Thus we can easily deduce (using Hensel): $f$ is irreducible over $F$ iff $E$ has supersingular reduction.
There are 2 cases:
If $E$ has supersingular reduction, then $D_{cris}(V)$ is clearly irreducible (or, simple) since $\varphi$ doesn't has an eigenvalue in $F$.
If $E$ has ordinary reduction then $f$ has 2 roots $\lambda_1,\lambda_2$ in $F$ with valuation $0,1$. By theorem 8.3.6 of CMI notes we know $D_{cris}(V)$ is reducible.
To sum up, $D_{cris}(V)$ is simple iff $E$ has supersingular reduction.
I have 2 questions:
Is the deduction right?
If it's right, is there a similar property for general Abelian varieties?