1
$\begingroup$

(Asking again in a new question because the previous version had insufficient conditions, as pointed out in the answer there.)

Define the densities:

$$p(\phi;\theta,r) = \Big(f\big(r\cos(\phi-\theta)\big) - f\big(r\cos(\phi+\theta)\big)\Big)\hspace{0.5pt} \frac{\sin(2\phi)}{\sin(2\theta)}, \quad 0 \le \phi,\theta\le \pi/2,\,r>0$$

where $f(x)=g(x^2)$, and the following hold: $g$ is twice-differentiable, increasing, and convex or concave on $(0,\infty)$, $g''(x)$ is non-decreasing on $(0,\infty)$, and $f'(0^+) < \infty$. Remarkably, the area of these densities is independent of $\theta$ whenever $g$ is increasing and concave or convex (without requiring the monotonicity of $g''(x)$), which can be shown using an integral representation. For $f(x)=|x|$, we have $\int_0^{\pi/2} p(\phi;\theta,r)d\phi=\frac{2}{3}r$.

Show that for all $r$, $p(\phi;\theta,r)$ has a monotone likelihood ratio (decreasing for concave $g$, increasing for convex $g$). I.e., for $0\le\theta_1 < \theta_2\le\pi/2$:

$$ h(\phi) = \frac{f\big(r\cos(\phi-\theta_2)\big) - f\big(r\cos(\phi+\theta_2)\big)}{f\big(r\cos(\phi-\theta_1)\big) - f\big(r\cos(\phi+\theta_1)\big)}$$

is monotonic on $[0,\pi/2]$.

Examples of functions are $f(x) = |x|^p$, $1\le p<2$, or for $p>2$. (For $p=2$, $p(\phi;\theta) = \sin^2(2\phi)$.) And the function $f(x) = \log( \cosh(x))$, which is concave in $x^2$, i.e. $g(x) = \log(\cosh(\sqrt{x}))$ is concave on $[0,\infty)$, and twice differentiable at $x=0$, unlike $|x|^p$, $p<2$.

An answer showing the this holds for either convex or concave $g$ is acceptable. This question can be considered as only asking for one of them.

This result is important to prove uniqueness of stable optima in the unmixing and deconvolution of linear mixtures of independent random variables with strongly sub- and super-gaussian densities, using the Karlin-Rubin theorem. The result can be proved for $f(x)=x^4$ by simplifying the derivative expression. This corresponds to using kurtosis as the the cost function, and the uniqueness result is already known in this case. For $f(x) = |x|$, the likelihood ratio is non-increasing, constant around $\phi=0$ and $\phi=\pi/2$.

$\endgroup$
13
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by"these densities indeed have the same measure for all $\theta$ whenever $g$ is concave or convex", and how to prove that? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 14, 2023 at 14:43
  • $\begingroup$ I mean he integral over $\phi$ from $0$ to $\pi/2$ is independent of $\theta$, just a constant function of $f$ and $r$. This can be shown by writing these functions as scale mixtures of $1-(1-x^2)_+$ or $(x^2-1)_+$ with Stieltjes measure $-f'(x)/x$ or $f'(x)/x$. So the densities can be written as a sum of piecewise kernels, which depend on the $\theta$ and $r$, but somehow each $\theta$ and $r$ variant integrates to the same function of $r$ independent of $\theta$. $\endgroup$
    – japalmer
    Commented Aug 14, 2023 at 14:52
  • $\begingroup$ The stronger functions here can be written as scale mixtures of $1-(1-x^2)^2_+$ or $(x^2-1)^2_+$ with Stieltjes measure $f''(x)$. $\endgroup$
    – japalmer
    Commented Aug 14, 2023 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ I think that showing the MLRP for these piecewise kernels over the common non-zero support will show that they satisfy the MLRP, and that then the sum also satisfies the MLRP. $\endgroup$
    – japalmer
    Commented Aug 14, 2023 at 15:01
  • $\begingroup$ The equal area for all $\theta$ doesn't actually matter as any normalizing factor becomes a constant in the likelihood ratio. It's just interesting and unexpected. $\endgroup$
    – japalmer
    Commented Aug 14, 2023 at 15:04

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\ep}{\varepsilon}$The "convex" part of this conjecture is not true in general.

Indeed, suppose it is true. Then (letting $x:=\phi$, $t:=\theta_1$, and $\theta_2\downarrow\theta_1=t$) we see that for any strictly increasing convex smooth function $g$ with $g'''\ge0$ and all $x$ and $t$ in $(0,\pi/2)$ we would have $h_2(g;x,t):=\partial_x\partial_t\,\ln(g(\cos^2(x-t))-g(\cos^2(x+t))\ge0$. (Note that for all $x$ and $t$ in $(0,\pi/2)$ we have $\cos^2(x-t)-\cos^2(x+t)=\sin2x\,\sin2t>0$, so that $h_2(g;x,t)$ is well defined.) For $c$ and $c_*$ in $[0,\infty)$ and real $\ep>0$, let $g(c):=g_{c_*,\ep}(c):=(\sqrt{(c-c_*)^2+\ep^2}+c-c_*)^2$.

Then the function $g$ is strictly increasing, convex, and smooth on $\mathbb R$, and $g'''>0$. However, $h_2(g;x,t)=-461586.955\ldots\not\ge0$ if $c_*=\frac{526}{1000}$, $\ep=\frac1{1000}$, $x=\frac{812}{1000}$, and $t=\frac{157}{100}$. So, the "convex" part of your conjecture is not true in general. $\quad\Box$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ It appears that conditions should be imposed on the derivatives of $g$ of all orders. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 15, 2023 at 15:08

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .