The hop $H_e$ is defined by $H_e(X) = X \oplus W_e^{X}$. A 2-REA operator (or double hop) $J_{\langle e,i\rangle}$ is defined by $J_{\langle e,i\rangle}(X) = H_e(H_i(X))$
By a famous result from Pseudo Jump Operators. I: The R. E. Case by Jockusch and Shore it's known that for any hop $H_e$ there is an r.e. set $A$ such that $H_e(A) \equiv_T 0'$. Or, as this holds uniformly, there is a computable function $f$ such that for any $e$ $H_e(H_{f(e)}(\emptyset)) \equiv_T 0'$.
I'm wondering if this extends to 2-REA operators. In other words, given $J$ a 2-REA operator does there always exist a 2-REA set (i.e. $H_e(H_i(\emptyset))$ for some $e$, $i$) $A$ such that $J(A) \equiv_T 0''$?
I'm guessing no. I bet there's a slick proof of this but it's not coming to me.
(Note that the claim holds if you allow $A$ to be an arbitrary set.)