I have encountered what feels like a very basic confusion relating to the Beilinson Bersnstein localisation theorem.
This theorem in particular states that if $F$ is a $D_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}$ module, assumed quasi-coherent as an $\mathcal{O}$-module, then $H^{1}(\mathbb{P^{1}},F)=0$.
Now let $F$ be an arbitrary quasi-coherent sheaf on $\mathbb{P}^{1}$ and let $JF\rightarrow F$ denote the sheaf of jets of $F$. This can be defined as $\pi_{1*}\pi_{2}^{*}F$, where $\pi_{i}$ are the projections from the formal neighbourhood of the diagonal inside $\mathbb{P}^{1}\times\mathbb{P}^{1}$. This has a flat connection and so defines a $D$-module on $\mathbb{P}^{1}$, this is explained in the introduction to Bezrukavnikov and Kaledin's Fedosov Quantization paper. On the other hand, it appears to surject naturally onto $F$, and so induces a surjection on $H^{1}$, as there is no $H^{2}$ obstructing this.
Now this clearly contradicts my understanding of the BB localisation theorem. As far as I can tell, there are no finiteness assumptions in the localisation theorem and so this doesn't seem to resolve the issue.
The only thing I can think that might explain it is a confusion whereby one is really considering the jet sheaf as an object of the pro- category of coherent sheaves, and not as a quasi-coherent one.