Let $f:X\to Y$ be a birational morphism of smooth projective variety. We assume that $f(V)\simeq U$ isomorphism induced by $f$, where $V\subset X$ and $U\subset Y$ are two Zariski open sets. Let $x\in V$, $C$ be a curve passing through $x$ in $X$ and $L$ be a line bundle over $Y$. Then is the following true?

$$f^{*}L\cdot C=L\cdot\overline{f(C\cap V)}$$

where $f^{*}L$ denotes the pullback of the line bundle $L$ and $\overline{f(C\cap V)}$ is the Zariski closure of $f(C\cap V)$ in $Y$.

Any suggestions/comments are welcome!


1 Answer 1


First note $\overline{f(C \cap V)} = f(C)$, since $f$ is closed and $C$ (and hence also $f(C)$) is irreducible. Also $f$ induces a birational map $C \to f(C)$, so $f_* [C] = [f(C)]$ where $[\cdot]$ denotes rational equivalence classes.

Then by the projection formula¹ $$f_* (f^* L \cdot [C]) = L \cdot f_* [C] = L \cdot [f(C)].$$

In a more general situation you will get $f_*(f^*L \cdot [C]) = \deg(f|_C) L \cdot [f(C)]$, if $f$ is not a birational map $C \to f(C)$.

¹ see e.g. Fulton's Intersection Theory, Proposition 2.3.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks!! @red_trumpet for your answer. I missed the point that birational morphism of curves is proper. $\endgroup$
    – tota
    Sep 23 at 14:06
  • $\begingroup$ @tota Not sure if I understand you correctly, but properness just comes from the projectivity of $X$ and $Y$, and has nothing to do with birationality. $\endgroup$ Sep 23 at 16:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.