7
$\begingroup$

I'm reading Michael Shulman's articles on cohomology in HoTT here and here, as well as Floris van Doorn's thesis here.

Given $E: Z \to \mathsf{Spectrum}$ a family of spectra over a homotopy type $Z$, they define the parametrized (or twisted) cohomology of $Z$ with coefficients in $E$ by $$H^n(Z; E) :\equiv \pi_0\left( \prod_{x \in X} E_n(x) \right)$$ where $\prod_{x \in X} E_n(x)$ denotes the appropriate type of sections. In the special case that we have a family of abelian groups $A: X \to \mathsf{AbGroup}$ then the composite with the Eilenberg-Mac Lane construction $H: \mathsf{AbGroup} \to \mathsf{Spectra}$ gives us a parametrized family of Eilenberg-Mac Lane spectra $HA: X \to \mathsf{Spectra}$. The corresponding twisted cohomology is cohomology with local coefficients.

Though they don't discuss it in their articles, I am wondering if we can get long exact sequences in parametrized cohomology starting from a cofibre sequence of types? I can see how you do it for unparametrized spectra, but the pi-types in parametrized cohomology make it a bit more confusing.

Specifically, suppose that I have a homotopy cofibre sequence $X \xrightarrow{f} Y \xrightarrow{q} C_f$ equipped with a parametrized spectrum $E: C_f \to \mathsf{Spectrum}$. Clearly I can pull back along $q$ and $q \circ f$ to get parametrized spectra $q^*E:=E \circ q: Y \to \mathsf{Spectrum}$ and $f^*q^*E:=E \circ q \circ f: X \to \mathsf{Spectrum}$. Does the above cofibre sequence give me a long exact sequence in parametrized cohomology?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

$\require{AMScd}$Yes. It is better to consider the more general situation of a pushout square of types, since pushout squares (unlike cofiber sequences) are stable under base change. Then the difference between parametrized and unparametrized disappears, since one can work in the $\infty$-topos over the pushout.

More generally, consider a pushout square \begin{CD} A @>>> B\\ @VVV @VVV\\ C @>>> D \end{CD} in an $\infty$-topos $T$ and a family of spectra $E$ over $D$. Then the induced square of global sections (where the pullbacks of $E$ are implicit) \begin{CD} \Gamma(D,E) @>>> \Gamma(C,E)\\ @VVV @VVV\\ \Gamma(B,E) @>>> \Gamma(A,E) \end{CD} is cartesian, hence gives rise to a long exact sequence of parametrized cohomology groups $$ \dots\to \pi_{n+1}\Gamma(A,E) \to \pi_n\Gamma(D,E) \to \pi_n\Gamma(B,E)\times \pi_n\Gamma(C,E)\to\dots. $$

The statement for a family of spectra $E$ is equivalent to the statement for each family of types $\Omega^{\infty-i}E$ (which gives the above long exact sequence up to the product of $\pi_{-i}$'s), so it suffices to consider a family of types. By the descent property of $\infty$-topoi, we have cartesian square of $\infty$-categories \begin{CD} T_{/D} @>>> T_{/C}\\ @VVV @VVV\\ T_{/B} @>>> T_{/A} \end{CD} The cartesian square of global sections is then a special case of the assertion that mapping spaces in a limit of $\infty$-categories are the limits of the mapping spaces. Alternatively, we can pass to spectrum objects to obtain a cartesian square of stable $\infty$-categories, and there is an analogous assertion about mapping spectra in a limit of stable $\infty$-categories.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Beautiful! Getting the long exact sequence for pushout squares is even better than I expected. Are there any sources that you would recommend for more of the details here? I'm reasonably comfortable with HoTT and I know that HoTT is supposed to be the internal language of infinity-topoi, but I don't know any infinity topos theory itself (e.g. slice infinity-topoi, descent etc.). $\endgroup$
    – ಠ_ಠ
    Commented Aug 29, 2022 at 11:35
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "Higher topos theory" by Lurie is the standard reference for $\infty$-topoi. Although in this case the appeal to "descent" is maybe overkill, we only really use the universal property of the pushout in the slice category $T_{/D}$ to write a mapping space out of $D$ as a pullback of mapping spaces. As for the fact that a cartesian square of pointed types induces a long exact sequence, I don't know a reference, but the trick is that such a cartesian square $(X,Y)\Rightarrow(Z,W)$ induces a fiber sequence $\Omega W\to X \to Y\times Z$, whence a long exact sequence. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 29, 2022 at 13:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .