1
$\begingroup$

Let $X$, $Y$, $Z$ be discrete random variables, with $Y$ and $Z$ independent. Does the following equality hold if $Z$ is independent also of $X$? $$ \max_{f_{Y,Z}} \big\{ \ I(X; f_{Y,Z}(Y,Z)) \ \big\} = \max_{f_X, f_Y} \big \{ \ I(X; f_Y(Y), f_Z(Z)) \ \big \} $$ where the maximization is taken over all non-injective, deterministic functions.

P.S.: See this for the inequality version of the question.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

No. Let $Y,Z$ be iid Bernoulli(1/2), and let $X=Y+Z$ mod 2, which induces pairwise independence. The only non-injective deterministic functions $f_Y,f_Z$ are constants, rendering the RHS zero. For the LHS, we can take $f_{Y,Z}(Y,Z)$ equal to the the binary AND of $Y$ and $Z$, which is not injective, and not independent of $X$. Hence, the LHS is something positive, showing there can be strict inequality.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ But is $X$ independent of $Z$? $\endgroup$
    – Cesare
    Sep 2, 2022 at 13:49
  • $\begingroup$ Ups, I noticed that I have a typo in the question. $\endgroup$
    – Cesare
    Sep 2, 2022 at 13:49
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, for that. The second independence, the one highlighted in bold, should have been with $X$ and not again with $Y$. I corrected this point now. $\endgroup$
    – Cesare
    Sep 2, 2022 at 15:12
  • $\begingroup$ My answer still works. X,Y,Z are pairwise independent in this construction. $\endgroup$
    – Tom
    Sep 3, 2022 at 14:53
0
$\begingroup$

I think I might be able to provide a proof for a slightly modified version of the hypotheses, which would still be enough for the theorem that I am trying to prove.

Let $F_1:=\{(y,z) \to f_1(y,z)\}$ and $F_2:= \{(y,z) \to (f_y(y),f_z(z))\}$ where $f_1$ and $f_2$ are non-injective. This relaxes the hypothesis that $f_y$ and $f_z$ must also be separately non-injective. We then have $$ \max_{F_1} \big\{ \ I(X; f_1(Y,Z)) \ \big\} = \max_{F_2} \big \{ \ I(X; f_2(Y,Z)) \ \big \} $$

Proof. Call $f_1^* = \arg \max_{F_1} \big\{ \ I(X; f_1(Y,Z)) \ \big\}$ and $f_2^* = (f_y^*, f_z^*)= \arg \max_{F_2} \big\{ \ I(X; f_2(Y,Z)) \ \big\}$. We have $$ I(X; Y, Z) \stackrel{(a)}{\ge} I(X; f_1^*(Y,Z)) \stackrel{(b)}{\ge} I(X; f_2^*(Y,Z)) = I(X; f_y^*(Y), f_z^*(Y)) \stackrel{(c)}{\ge} I(X; Y, f_z^*) \stackrel{(d)}{=} I(X;Y) $$ where (a) follows from the data processing inequality, (b) from the fact that $F_2 \subseteq F_1$, (c) from the definition of $f_2^*$ and from the fact that $(y, f_z^*(z)) \in F_2$, and (d) from the fact that $f_z^*(Z)$ is independent of $X$ and $Y$. Because $I(X;Y,Z) = I(X;Y)$ we obtain $I(X; f_1^*(Y,Z)) = I(X; f_2^*(Y,Z))$. Is that correct?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.