0
$\begingroup$

I'm working with a time independent (vector) Itô SDE such as:

$$ dX = a(X) dt + b(X) dW. $$

I've looked (numerically) at several examples and it seems that the autocovariance function $r_{xx}(\Delta t)$ is continuous and goes to zero exponentially fast at large $\Delta t$.

Is that true for sufficiently nice $a$, $b$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand\Cov{\operatorname{Cov}}\newcommand\De\Delta$No. Even in the nicest case when $a=0$ and $b=1$, so that $X=W$, we have $$\Cov(X_t,X_{t+\De t})=t\underset{\De t\to\infty}{\not\longrightarrow}0 \tag{1}\label{1}$$ for any real $t\ge0$.

On the other hand, for any smooth enough $a$ and $b$ and any real $t\ge0$ and $\De_t\ge0$, the random variable $X_{t+\De t}-X_t$ is independent of $X_t$ (and even of the entire pre-history $(X_s\colon s\in[0,t])$), so that $$\Cov(X_t,X_{t+\De t}-X_t)=0 \tag{2}\label{2}$$ and, moreover, $$\Cov(X_s-X_r,X_{t+\De t}-X_t)=0 \tag{3}\label{3}$$ for all real $r,s$ in $[0,t]$. Perhaps, this is the reason for your numerical observations. (The equalities in \eqref{2} and \eqref{3} also follow from the equality in \eqref{1}.)


N.B.: The correct way to write the SDE is this: $dX_t=a(X_t)\,dt+b(X_t)\,dW_t$.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Case $a=0$ looks quite special. For example in Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process covariance goes to zero fast. Maybe if $X$ has stationary distribution? $\endgroup$
    – Radost
    Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 14:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ TeX note: Although of course there is nothing wrong with \newcommand\Cov{\operatorname{Cov}}, there is a shortcut, namely, \DeclareMathOperator\Cov{Cov}. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 14:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LSpice : Thank you for your comment. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 16:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Radost : No, $a=0$ is not an exception. In particular, any drift not depending (or weakly enough depending) on $X_t$ will do, for the autocovariance not to go to $0$. Any drift of the form $a(x)=bx+c$ with $b\ge0$ will do as well. On the other hand, the case of stationary diffusion processes is indeed special. Since stationarity is not mentioned in your post, I suggest that you post the question with the additional stationarity condition separately, possibly elsewhere, making sure that the modified question does not look as a duplicate. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 16:14
  • $\begingroup$ @Radost : Do you have a further response to this answer and the comments? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 9, 2022 at 21:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .