2
$\begingroup$

I am aware that the implicit and inverse function theorems can be generalized to infinite dimensional cases, but I am having difficulty in applying it to a specific calculation.

Let $C^1_{\mathbb{R}}[0,1]$ be the space of real-valued $C^1$ functions on the interval $[0,1]$. If we impose the following norm: $$ \begin{equation} \lVert f \rVert := \lVert f \rVert_{\sup}+\lVert f' \rVert_{\sup} \end{equation} $$ for $f \in C^1_{\mathbb{R}}[0,1]$, it is clear that $C^1_{\mathbb{R}}[0,1]$ is a Banach space over $\mathbb{R}$.
Similarly, $C_{\mathbb{R}}[0,1]$ is the Banach space of real-valued continuous functions on $[0,1]$ with the supremum norm.

Then, we can think of the operator $F:C_{\mathbb{R}}^1[0,1] \to C_{\mathbb{R}}[0,1]$ defined by $$ \begin{equation} F(f):=\sinh(f)+(f')^2 \end{equation} $$ How do I show that (or is it indeed true that) $F$ is strongly $C^1$ and the derivative at each point is a linear isomorphism? More generally, how about the case $f \to G(f,f')$ for any smooth function $G : \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}$ whose Jacobian determinant never vanishes?

I appreciate any help.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't $F'(0)$ just the inclusion map sending $C^1([0,1])$ into $C([0,1])$? (or have I just displayed an embarrassing inability to differentiate ;)) $\endgroup$
    – DCM
    Dec 29, 2021 at 22:22
  • $\begingroup$ Just in case you're not aware of it already: there are lots of nice examples of this sort of thing in R. S. Hamilton's "The Inverse Function Theorem of Nash and Moser". $\endgroup$
    – DCM
    Dec 29, 2021 at 22:55

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

The derivative of $F$ at $f \in C^1[0,1])$ is by definition the linear operator $F'(f): C^1[0,1] \rightarrow C[0,1]$ given by $$ F'(f)\dot{f} = \lim_{t\rightarrow 0} \frac{F(f+t\dot{f}) - F(f)}{t}. $$ Here, you get $$ F'(f) = (\cosh f)\dot{f} + 2f'\dot{f}'. $$ To apply the inverse function theorem, you need a linear operator $G(f): C[0,1] \rightarrow C^1[0,1]$ such that $F'(f)G(f)g = g$. In other words, given any $g in C[0,1]$, you need to be able to solve for $\dot{f} \in C^1[0,1]$ so that $$ (\cosh f)\dot{f} + 2f'\dot{f}' = g. $$ It's easy to check that if $f = 0$, then this is not possible. $F'(0)$ does have a right inverse, but it is not a bounded linear map from $C[0,1]$ to $C^1[0,1]$. So you cannot invert $F$ near $f = 0$ using the inverse function theorem for Banach spaces. In order to use the inverse function theorem, you need to "regain" the derivative you lost because $F'(f)$ is a first order differential operator.

So you want to restrict to $f$ such that the linear ODE above is a nondegenerate one, i.e., you can write it in the form $$ \dot{f}' = \dots, $$ where the right side is continuous on $[0,1]$. Next, you show that, for a given $f$, this ODE always has a solution $\dot{f} \in C^1[0,1]$. You also need to show that the map from $g$ to $\dot{f}$ can be chosen to be a bounded linear map from $C[0,1]$ to $C^1[0,1]$. This is all straightforward using the existence and uniqueness theorem for ODEs.

Offhand, I don't see how to show that $F$ is locally invertible on a neighborhood of $0$ in $C^1[0,1]$. However, you can show that it is locally invertible in a neighborhood of $0$ in $C^k[0,1]$ for $k$ sufficiently large (including $k = \infty$) by using the Nash-Moser inverse function theorem, as mentioned by @DCM.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

If $F(f) = G(f,f')$ for some $G\in C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2)$ then I think you can establish that

$$ F'(f)u = (\partial_1 G)(f,f')u + (\partial_2 G)(f,f')u' $$

holds in much the same way as if you were dealing with functions of real variables. Writing $D:C^1 \to C$ for differentiation and $I:C^1\to C$ for the inclusion map,

$$ F'(f) = (\partial_1 G)(f,f')I + (\partial_2 G)(f,f')D $$

is:

  • Fredholm if $(\partial_2 G)(f,f')$ is everywhere nonzero; and
  • Compact if $(\partial_2 G)(f,f')$ is everywhere zero

In the second case, $F'(f)$ can't be an isomorphism.

For the example you give (i.e. $G(x,y) = \sinh(x)+y^2$), $F'(0)$ is the inclusion of $C^1$ into $C$, which can't be an isomorphism for the simpler reason that not all continuous functions are $C^1$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.