Let $X$ be a smooth scheme over a field $k$ and let $\mathsf{D}_{\text{qc}}(\mathcal{D}_X)$ be the full subcategory of $\mathsf{D}(\mathcal{D}_X\mathsf{-Mod})$ composed of the complexes of $\mathcal{D}_X$-modules with quasi-coherent cohomology.
If $f:X\to Y$ is a morphism between such schemes, we have natural functors $$f_*:\mathsf{D}_{\text{qc}}(\mathcal{D}_X)\leftrightarrows \mathsf{D}_{\text{qc}}(\mathcal{D}_Y):f^!.$$
If we restrict to the subcategory of complexes with holonomic cohomology, then the Verdier duality functor allows us to find left adjoints $f^*$ and $f_!$ of $f_*$ and $f^!$, respectively.
I wonder if those adjoints already exist in $\mathsf{D}_{\text{qc}}(\mathcal{D}_X)$.
Perhaps we can use Brown representability for left adjoints (as in Neeman's book about triangulated categories) or some other adjoint functor theorem...
In Neeman's paper The Grothendieck Duality Theorem via Bousfield's Techniques, it is proven that $f_*$ has a right adjoint (even though in the text it is said that it's a left adjoint). Perhaps we can use this functor to construct our left adjoints?
\mathsf{}
and\textsf{}
: $\mathsf{D}(\mathcal{D}_X\mathsf{-Mod})$ versus $\mathsf{D}(\mathcal{D}_X\textsf{-Mod}).$ The latter gives you a hyphen rather than a minus sign. A hyphen would be standard here, if I understand you correctly. $\endgroup$