3
$\begingroup$

In Salamon's notes on Floer homology, it's claimed that under some non-degenerancy assumptions the operator $$D:= \partial_s+J_0\partial_t+S(s,t): W^{1,p}(\mathbb{R}\times S^1,\mathbb{R}^{2n})\rightarrow L^p(\mathbb{R}\times S^1,\mathbb{R}^{2n})$$ is Fredholm for $1<p<\infty$, and moreover its Fredholm index is given by index $$D=\mu_{CZ}(\Psi^{+})-\mu_{CZ}(\Psi^{-}).$$

Now I was trying to see why this index formula holds up. In the lectures notes the author claims that this formula is true for $p=2$, where we are dealing with Hilbert spaces, by using the spectral flow of the family of operators $J_0\partial_t+S(s,t)$. However nothing else is said for the case where $p\neq 2$. It's clear that in the end this Fredholm index won't depend on the choice of $p$, but a priori we would need to prove that this is true so that we get the desired result just by proving the case $p=2$. Is this what is happening in this situation ? We can show that $D$ has the same Fredholm index for any $p$ without using the Conley-Zehnder index ?

Any insight is appreciated, thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The idea is to show that the kernel & cokernel consist of smooth sections, and thus are independent of $p$. Since the Fredholm index is the difference between the dimensions of these, it doesn't depend on $p$.

This is proved, admittedly in the case without punctures, in an appendix of McDuff & Salamon's J-holomorphic curve book.

Another good reference, this time with punctures, is from Chris Wendl's lecture notes/book draft. The direct link to the PDF file is here: https://www.mathematik.hu-berlin.de/~wendl/Sommer2020/SFT/lecturenotes.pdf

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ So the fact that the kernel and Cokernel are smooth sections I think will follow from elliptic bootstrapping .By this I mean that every element in those sets will be of class $C$\infty}, I am not sure this is what you mean. But why does the fact that they consist of smooth sections imply that it is independent of $p$? $\endgroup$
    – Someone
    Oct 11, 2021 at 8:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Something: I should have written "smooth and of exponential decay". Since the sections are then smooth and decaying exponentially, they are in each of the Sobolev spaces you consider. I can't give you an immediate reference, but I'd look at Wendl's book. I'm editing my answer to include a link to it. $\endgroup$
    – Sam Lisi
    Oct 11, 2021 at 22:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.